Working group: Users
Who-is-who? - Profiles
Results and Conclusion of the workgroup
Please give a feedback on the minutes of the second session
- minutes second meeting 20060608 [1] (.doc).
Feedback from members:
MartinVögeli?: Thanks for the minutes! I was missing ...
- ... my remark about choosing a (single) OS LMS would be a good thing for marketing the idea/product within our institutions
- ... the impression that most of the present members of our working group would vote for Moodle (5/7 UAS work with Moodle)
- ... my remark about the improved group functions in Moodle 1.6 (coming soon - have a look at http://docs.moodle.org/en/Roadmap)
---
Results of discussion about 3 figures (sended by the project team).
1. possible infrastructure,
2. Centralization / decentralization scenarios,
3. "switch services" The big picture, e-Academia
[2] (.pdf)
- It is necessary to set up a national service (helpdesk) composed and structured by a community of various expert groups.
- So local suppporters can revert to a national helpdesk (for technical but also didactical and organizational support)
- Expert groups on a national level are available for institutions of higher education (specialized on complexe problems).
- Local support for users (students, teachers) is organized locally by the institutions(specialised on practical problems)
- Most, but not every University and UAS had choosen their OS-LMS or repository. It could still be interesting to have a national LMS/repository service with hosting and support (also for economical reasons).
- Furthermore the national service can coordinate releases, manage unsolved questions und participate at the official OS-LMS community.
- Institutions with the same type of OS-LMS (locally installed) can profit from this general service.
Minutes
- minutes first meeting 20060504 [3] (.doc).
Meetings
status: concluded
